Method and an apparatus for analysing objects

ABSTRACT

A method and an apparatus for analysing at least one object, comprising at least one means for capturing images of said at least one object and means for generating a relative mutual movement between said at least one image capturing means and said at least one object, and further comprising means for processing and analysing images captured by the image capturing means. The relative mutual movement involves a mutual rotational movement between said at least one object and said image capturing means, thus establishing two or more images of said object(s) at various angular positions relative the image capturing means for further processing and analysis in a computer based image analyser.

The present invention relates to a method and an apparatus for analysing objects. More particularly, the invention relates to analysing objects contained in a flow or product sample, where data as individual object size and shape, and common data as size distribution, among others can be calculated and monitored.

One embodiment of arranging the flow of objects, that could be objects in a stream, is to form a substantially mono-layer or curtain, where the objects are captured by an image processing unit.

From EP 0348469 B1 there is known a method of automatic particle analysis and means for performing the same, where size distribution of objects and a deviation of said particles from a desired shape and a desired colour can be determined. Samples of said particles are flowing out of a silo and down onto a vibrating plate, thus generating a flowing monolayer object curtain. The particles are allowed to fall over an edge of said plate. The curtain is lighted and pictures are recorded thereof at least one place. The pictures are then analysed, particularly with respect to particle size distribution in the flow and deviation from desired shape.

One shortcoming related to this type of analysing technique is that the imaging equipment records the shape and extent of a particle in just two dimensions (2-D), and is therefore best suited for homogeneous objects or spheres. However, when analysing inhomogeneous objects, the third dimension of the particle (the dimension orthogonal to the imaging plane), will remain somewhat unknown by using this type of prior art equipment.

With the present invention it is now possible to image and process objects in substantial three dimensions (3-D) by the means of one image recording unit. This is achieved by means of a controlled propagation and rotation of the objects together with an algorithm that collects and calculates the images captured of the individual objects by the image recording unit as it passes through the measuring volume.

These and further advantages can be achieved by the invention as defined in the accompanying claims.

In the following, the present invention shall be further described by means of examples and figures where:

FIG. 1 discloses a principal drawing of the 3-D imaging apparatus in accordance with the present invention,

FIG. 2 discloses real images of falling objects, captured by the apparatus disclosed in FIG. 1.

The 3D imaging can be performed by a setup as shown in FIG. 1.

Here the sample is poured into one funnel 1. The sample is then fed by the vibrator plate 2 and falls off the edge 3 of this plate. The rotation is due to the effect of gravity and partial support on the feeder plate and also due to the movement of the vibration feeder. The rotation starts as the object slides off the feeder plate.

The objects in the sample then fall and rotate into the measuring volume where the imaging system 4 captures multiple images of objects in the sample. Typically, each individual object is captured many times as shown by the numbers on the left side identifying the instances captured of one of the many objects falling.

There can be a lot of objects of different shape and size in each image.

The object(s) are captured by using high speed imaging system with a frame rate high enough to give multiple images (2 or more images) of the object(s) as they are passing the measuring volume (or area covered by the camera).

The rotation of the objects can be generated by the way they are fed into the measuring volume.

One method to introduce the objects into the measuring volume is by using a vibrator feeder, and when the objects fall down at the end of the feeder, the gravity force creates a rotation since part of the object is supported by the feeder and the other part of the object is influenced by the gravitational field. This will create a rotation.

Other methods to ensure that a rotation is obtained can be to use some sort of mechanical excitation device that acts on the objects as they leave the feeder. This could be a vibrating “string” positioned at the feeder outlet.

Other methods to feed the objects and generate rotation could be to use a conveyor belt, pneumatic nozzle, sliding system, feeding by drum, etc.

The object numbered 1, 2, 3, 4 is the same object in consecutive images, see FIG. 1. This gives different projection areas as indicated in the figure due to rotation of the objects. See also FIG. 2, where real captured images are shown, the same objects are recognized and identified in consecutive images.

Each individual object is recognized in consecutive images by using the law of physics. This can be done by using the characteristics of the force field governing the motion of the object(s) in order to estimate the next position and recognize the same object(s) multiple times in consecutive images.

The objects can also be recognized if they have a known velocity, e.g. on a conveyor belt or in a liquid cell or the similar.

Other ways to do the recognition is to let the imaging system follow the objects either with linear motion or rotational motion

In order to estimate the next position and the movement within the image area when the objects fall in a gravitational field, the distance the object has moved from the feeder when it is observed in the measuring volume can be used to estimate the time the object has been falling. In order to do this, the distance from the feeder to the top of the image, the image height and the time between the images is used. By using all this information, it is possible to estimate the position an object will have in the next image, by using the position of the object in the current image. This method is used for each new image and all the objects observed in each individual image, in order to recognize each individual object multiple times as they move through the measuring volume.

Calculation of Next Position:

The distance an object falls within a time t is given by: $y = {\frac{1}{2}{gt}^{2}}$

The distance from the vibrator feeder to the top of the image (h_(t)) is known, also the height of the image (h_(i)) and the number of pixels in the image (p_(m)).

(For objects with low density and small diameter, a formula that takes into consideration the drag coefficient of the object should also be used in order to correct the distance/time in order to give a better estimate.)

If an object is observed at a certain pixel position (p_(x1)), then the distance (p₁) the object has been falling can be calculated: ${p_{1}\left( p_{x\quad 1} \right)} = {h_{t} + \frac{h_{i}p_{x\quad 1}}{p_{m} - 1}}$

The time this object has been falling: $t_{1} = \sqrt{2\frac{h_{t} + \frac{h_{i}p_{x\quad 1}}{p_{m} - 1}}{g}}$

What we want, is to estimate the position this object is likely to occur in the next image taken by the camera at the time: t ₂ t ₁ Δt

Where Δt is the time between the two images and equal to 1/FPS, where FPS is the number of images taken pr. second.

The most likely position (p₂) for the object in the next image as a function of the pixel position (p_(x1)) in the current image (at the time t₂) can be expressed by: ${p_{2}\left( p_{x\quad 1} \right)} = {\frac{1}{2}{g\left( {\frac{1}{fps} + \sqrt{2\frac{h_{t} + \frac{h_{i}p_{x\quad 1}}{p_{m} - 1}}{g}}} \right)}^{2}}$

and the most likely pixel position (p_(x2)) can be calculated on the basis of p₂: $p_{x\quad 2} = {\frac{p_{2} - h_{t}}{h_{i}}\left( {p_{m} - 1} \right)}$

this gives the function that estimates the next position (p_(x2)) as a function of the previous position (p_(x1)): ${p_{x\quad 2}\left( p_{x\quad 1} \right)} = \frac{\left( {p_{m} - 1} \right)\left( {{\frac{1}{2}{g\left( {\frac{1}{fps} + \sqrt{2\frac{h_{t} + \frac{h_{i}p_{x\quad 1}}{p_{m} - 1}}{g}}} \right)}^{2}} - h_{t}} \right)}{h_{i}}$

EXAMPLE

h_(t)=0.04

h_(i)=0.35

g=9.81

p_(n)=1024

fps=50

First observation of the object, p_(x1)=39

By applying the function for p_(x2) (39) the next estimate is 105, then by using 105 as p_(x1), p_(x2) (105) gives 182 as the next estimate etc. $\quad\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 39 \\ 2 & 105 \\ 3 & 182 \\ 4 & 271 \\ 5 & 371 \\ 6 & 483 \\ 7 & 606 \\ 8 & 741 \\ 9 & 867 \\ 10 & 1044 \end{pmatrix}$

The table above shows that we are able to observe the particle 9 times with this setup (Image-height, FPS. etc . . . ) since it falls outside the image area on the 10th estimate (1044>1024).

Algorithm for Analysing of Objects in 3D

A camera/framegrabber captures 2 Dimensional images of the flowing/falling monolayer curtain of objects. For each image captured, all the objects in the image are Identified and measured. This is done by scanning the image until an object is found. Then the circumference of the object is traversed and the measurements for this individual object performed. Then the search continues until all objects in the image are identified and measured. This results in a list containing one record for each object in the corresponding image, describing the individual objects in detail. P _(b,n) ={A D _(A) L, X _(f−max)}

Where the index b equals image number and index n is the object number. A, D_(A), L . . . is area, Diameter based on area, max length etc . . .

Definitions:

Δτ Time between images, i.e. between t₁ and t₂

A Object area measured

D_(A) Diameter based on area

X_(f−max) Ferret diameter

(b₂) Image number b2

(b₁) Image number b1, previous image

X(t₁) Centre point, position where object is observed at time t₁ in image b₁

X(t₂) Centre point, position of a object that has been moving for t₂=Δτ+t₁ and observed in image b₂

L Max length of object

Next step is to identify objects observed in image (b₂) where the same object was observed in the previous image (b₁) and give the two instances of the same object the same object number.

This is done by applying the laws of physics governing the motion of a object in a conservative force field, such as the gravitational field. Thereby estimating the position an object in the previous image (b₁) would have in image (b₂) after moving in the force field for a time Δτ, the time between two consecutive images.

The position estimate for each object in (b₁) falling for Δτ seconds, is then compared to the actual position of the objects in (b₂). If the centre point of this estimate is within a certain uncertainty radius in the image plane, for the actual position in (b₂) a match is found.

If a match is found for the object in (b₂), then the object is accepted as being another representation of the object in (b₁) if the area of the object is within a certain size tolerance. Then the object in (b₂) is assigned the same number as the object in (b₁).

If there is more than one matching object (more than one object with the centre point within the uncertainty-radius), the one with size closest to the object in (b₁) is selected and given the number of the corresponding object in (b₁).

If no objects are found that is within the (uncertainty) tolerance, it will be assigned the next available ordinal object number in the sequence, unless the position of the object in (b₂) is larger than ${p_{x\quad 2}(0)} + \frac{D_{A}}{2}$ then the object is discarded.

This will be repeated for all objects in the image (b₂), until all have been assigned numbers or discarded.

The same process will be repeated recursively for the next images (trying to find the same objects in the previous image), until all the samples have been fed through the analyser. 10000 images is taken for a typical sample.

And there might be 1000 to 1000000 objects in the sample and 10 to 1000 objects in each image typically.

After all/parts of the sample is analysed, a list of object information is available for further processing. An example of the results generated is shown in Table 1: TABLE 1 the representation of the instances of the objects Xf- Xf- ImgNo PartNo A Da min max . . . 1 1 1 1.13 0.49 1.43 2 1 1.1 1.18 0.32 1.31 3 1 1.2 1.24 0.28 1.85 4 1 0.9 1.07 0.28 1.61 1 2 2 1.60 0.42 3.15 2 2 2.1 1.64 0.44 2.80 3 2 3 1.95 1.78 2.33 4 2 1.8 1.51 0.58 2.27 2 3 5 2.52 0.63 2.95 3 3 4 2.26 0.64 2.93 4 3 3.3 2.05 1.10 4.05 2 4 8 3.19 0.69 5.92 3 4 6 2.76 0.57 4.26 4 4 5 2.52 1.89 3.97 5 4 5.5 2.65 1.09 4.97

By processing the information in Table 1, a better estimate for each object can be found than with 2-D imaging and analysis since more measurements are available for each object.

Example: For object no 1, Xf-max can be estimated to 1.85, Xf-min to 0.28, the area could be estimated by taking an average of all the measured areas etc.

The Area Â could also be estimated by using all available information about the object: Â=f(A, D_(A), X_(f−min), X_(f−max), . . . )where the function f can be found by using different optimization techniques in order to give better estimates. (Â means estimated area.)

Also compound measures like UT-ratio ( Length/Thickness ) can be found, in our example it will be L/T=1.85/0.28=6.66.

Here we have used the 4 individual measurements of the object to find; the maximum length and the minimum width of object number 1. By using these numbers, we get a better estimate of L/T-Ratio than using traditional methods where only a single measurement of the object is used.

While prior art methods would give one of the results in the set [2.92, 4.12, 6.54, 5.77, . . . ] depending on which of the 4 measurements of the object are used. TABLE 2 L/T ratios based on classical methods Xf- Xf- ImgNo PartNo A Da min max L/T 1 1 1 1.13 0.49 1.43 2.92 2 1 1.1 1.18 0.32 1.31 4.09 3 1 1.2 1.24 0.28 1.85 6.61 4 1 0.9 1.07 0.28 1.61 5.75 mean 4.84 sdev 1.65

By processing all instances of all the objects in such a way, a single representation for each object can be achieved with higher degree of accuracy than that of prior art.

The single object representation might look like (Table 3): TABLE 3 Processed object information Part A Xf- Xf- No AVG Da min max L/T . . . 1 1.05 1.16 0.28 1.85 6.61 2 2.23 1.68 0.42 3.15 7.50 3 4.10 2.28 0.63 4.05 6.43 4 6.13 2.79 0.57 5.92 10.39

This representation of the objects (Table 3) can be applied as an input in commonly available systems for representing and analysing the object size distribution and the shape properties thereof.

The new method can be used to give a better estimate of object properties than prior art where only one image of each object was used (or multiple images of the same object that was not identified as the same object.) The multiple images of each object can then be used to estimate different size and shape properties for each individual object. Like maximum length, minimum width, average volume and more complex size and shape properties.

This new invention will have large benefits in dynamic object imaging technology. One example of a better estimate is measurement of maximum length. If one measures the maximum length of each instance of an individual object, then the maximum value of these lengths gives a better estimate compared to the real maximum object length than the maximum length of a random instance of a particular object.

More complex properties can be the length/thickness ratio where the length is characterized by the maximum length of an individual object and the thickness by the minimum width of the same object, but not necessarily the same instance of this object.

Based on the improved estimates for each individual object, a more accurate result for the total sample can be created.

It should be understood that instead of generating a rotation of the objects, the imaging means can be arranged for performing a rotation about the objects. The objects can be stationary and resting on a transparent layer or the like, or they can move in the gravitational field or on a conveyor or the like while the imaging means performs an orbital or helical motion relative said objects.

The examples as described above relate to particles, but it should be understood that the principles of the present invention can be applied for any type of objects. For instance when classifying food products such as potatoes or the similar, or even fish. 

1-10. (canceled)
 11. A method for analysing at least one object comprising at least one means for capturing images of said at least one object and further means for generating a relative mutual movement between said image capturing means and said at least one object, wherein the relative mutual movement involves a mutual rotational movement between said at least one object and said image capturing means, thus establishing two or more images of said object(s) captured at different angular positions for further processing and analysis of said object(s) in a computer based image analyser.
 12. A method in accordance with claim 11, wherein the object(-s) is allowed to move in a plane substantially perpendicular to the view axis of the image capturing means, where the first image (b₁) of the object is captured at a time t, and the next image (b₂) is captured at a time t₂=t₁+Δτ.
 13. A method in accordance with claim 12, wherein the centre point of the object X (t₁) is defined on the basis of the first image b, and then an estimate for the position of the centre point of the object X (t₂) in image b₂ is calculated, and further a tolerance area with its centre in X (t₂) is calculated, then if one object in b₂ has its centre within said tolerance area a match is found.
 14. A method in accordance with claim 13, wherein the object is accepted as being another representation of the corresponding object in the first image (b₁) if the area thereof is within a certain size tolerance.
 15. A method in accordance with claim 14, wherein if no objects are found that is within the (uncertainty) tolerance, it will be assigned the next available ordinal object number in the sequence, unless the position of the object in (b₂) is larger than ${p_{x\quad 2}(0)} + \frac{D_{A}}{2}$ then the object is discarded.
 16. An apparatus for analysing at least one object comprising at least one means for capturing images of said at least one object thus representing a measuring volume, and means for generating a relative mutual movement between said at least one image capturing means and said at least one objects, and further comprising means for processing and analysing images captured in the measuring volume represented by the image capturing means, wherein the relative mutual movement involves a mutual rotational movement between said at least one object and said image capturing means, thus establishing two or more images of said object(s) at various angular positions relative the image capturing means for further processing and analysis in a computer based image analyser.
 17. An apparatus in accordance with claim 16, wherein the apparatus comprises an image processing unit that identifies object(s) in one image relatively to the same object(s) in a previous image.
 18. An apparatus in accordance with claim 17, wherein the image processing unit comprises a computer based algorithm to recognize and verify the objects.
 19. An apparatus in accordance with claim 17, wherein the image capturing means is a mega pixel camera.
 20. An apparatus in accordance with claim 16, where the object(s) is allowed to fall in the gravity field, wherein the object(s) to be analysed is given a rotation by mechanical means.
 21. An apparatus in accordance with claim 17, where the object(s) is allowed to fall in the gravity field, wherein the object(s) to be analysed is given a rotation by mechanical means.
 22. An apparatus in accordance with claim 18, where the object(s) is allowed to fall in the gravity field, wherein the object(s) to be analysed is given a rotation by mechanical means.
 23. An apparatus in accordance with claim 19, where the object(s) is allowed to fall in the gravity field, wherein the object(s) to be analysed is given a rotation by mechanical means. 